Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα First. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα First. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

28/12/10

Note to Estranged Co-Founders: Settle Your Baggage First, Pitch Reporters Second

I posted a story earlier today about a cool company called Bonobos, which makes better-fitting hipster pants and just raised $18.5 million in funding. I did an extensive interview with the founder and CEO Andy Dunn last night and asked a lot of detailed questions about how the company was founded and the early days. At the end, I asked if there was anything else I didn’t ask that I should know. His answers were reflected in the story I wrote and posted this morning.

And then all Hell broke loose in Bonobos land. As far as I can tell, Dunn didn’t say anything inaccurate, and so I didn’t write anything inaccurate. But by all accounts the details of his co-founder’s role in launching the company were glossed over. To Dunn’s credit, he was the first one to call me this morning and ask me to make some changes to reflect what he’d left out. I’ve since updated the original story to explain that Brian Spaly was really the one who designed the pants in the early days, and the ideas for how to fix the problem with how pants fit were his. Afterwards the two had a falling out, the accounts of which are mixed and I won’t hash out the he-said/he-said debate that I’ve been dragged into today.

None of this is uncommon when two friends or roommates start a company. Startups are pressure cookers, and in the early days there are daily forks in the road about which a lot of founders disagree. And it doesn’t distract from how impressive of a job Dunn has done taking Spaly’s designs and building them into a burgeoning brand that captured a large funding round from two of the most prominent VCs in the space. And Spaly himself has gone on to found a new company called Trunk Club.

But what was uncommon about it was that Dunn didn’t lay his cards on the table in the interview, and that I have been dragged into a nasty aftermath, instead of the two handling the disagreement between themselves before or after the fact.

I bring this up to clear up any confusion, first of all. I’m not comfortable continually tweaking a story that dramatically without an explanation, especially since a lot of our stories are syndicated right when they are published, and other things are written based on what we write. But I also bring it up, because it’s an important lesson for every founder team. Lately, I’ve been hearing some anecdotal accounts of co-founders doing everything with a handshake and having huge misunderstandings later on. Have we learned nothing from Facebook’s lawsuits?

Even if you are best friends and will be forever, formalize relationships on paper. And if one of you leaves the company, negotiate what that means, who is called a co-founder and who isn’t, what each of you gets credit for and how you will handle it when someone asks you about it. Because if you are successful, someone will. Neither Dunn nor Spaly should have been surprised this would become an issue when the company was raising large amounts of money and seeking press as part of its customer acquisition strategy. “Why’d you start this company?” shouldn’t be an unanticipated question when you’re pitching TechCrunch, and if your answer isn’t the unvarnished truth, at least make sure you’re all on the same page about what that answer is.


View the original article here

26/12/10

This Day in History: First Song in Space

">

Ned Potter is the science correspondent for ABC's "World News with Diane Sawyer." He has reported on such topics as space exploration, the human genome and climate change.

« Previous | Main

December 16, 2010 4:35 PM

Gemini 7 Just a bit of space trivia: It was 45 years ago today, on Dec. 16, 1965, that astronauts played the first song from orbit.

It's not a big deal.  The Russians had already launched the first man into space and the first woman, and the first footsteps on the moon were less than four years away.

That would be a very big deal.  To that end, two American spacecraft, Gemini 6 and Gemini 7, had just performed the first rendezvous in orbit -- something pretty remarkable because it is no small matter for two ships, whizzing along at 17,500 mph in the near-vacuum 150 miles up, to fly formation six feet apart.  Apollo astronauts would have to do it in order to return from the moon to their command ship in lunar orbit.

So on Dec. 15, 1965, astronauts Wally Schirra and Tom Stafford, in Gemini 6, used the orbiting Gemini 7 as a target for practice.  They launched from Cape Canaveral and caught up with Frank Borman and Jim Lovell after four orbits.

The next day, before returning to earth, Schirra and Stafford pulled a little stunt.  Here's how Schirra, the resident prankster among the original seven astronauts, described it in his autobiography, "Schirra's Space:"

"Houston, this is Gemini 6."

"Roger, Gemini 6," Capcom Elliot See responded.

"We have an object, looks like a satellite going from north to south, probably in polar orbit.... Looks like he might be going to re-enter soon.... You just might let me pick up that thing.... I see a command module and eight smaller modules in front. The pilot of the command module is wearing a red suit."

On that cue, they played "Jingle Bells" on a harmonica and set of bells they'd smuggled on board.  Schirra once said, "Levity is appropriate in a dangerous trade."

Hat tip to Russell Goldman of our staff, who noticed a post about this on BoingBoing. One person there commented that the mechanical beep-beep-beep of Sputnik 1 in 1957 was perhaps, in its way, a much earlier song.

(NASA image: Gemini 7 as seen from Gemini 6, Dec. 15, 1965. Click to enlarge.)

December 16, 2010 in Adventure, Books, History, Space, Technology | Permalink | Share | User Comments (0)

User Comments

Post a comment


View the original article here

15/12/10

The First WikiLeaker [Voices]

This is a section of the All Things Digital Web site featuring posts from around the Web, from other Dow Jones properties and also original pieces we solicit. The section is now explicitly labeled that it comes "from other Web sites."

We are fully aware of the controversies around how linking and aggregating is done on the Web and we, in no way, are attempting to "scrape" original content created by others. Instead, regarding third-party posts, we are trying to point readers of this site to other posts from around the Web that we admire and are trying to do so in the quickest manner possible.

The Internet is full of terrific content that is not ours and we want to help our readers find it by making editorial suggestions--Look, Mom, no algorithm!--of posts we think are worth their time.

That is why we have made even more changes to Voices to ensure we do this in the most transparent and timely way. While we don't expect that everyone will agree with our policies, we have made changes that reflect our intent in pointing to content outside our site.

So here is exactly what we do: Read more »

Because the site is wholly owned by Dow Jones, publisher of The Wall Street Journal, we aim to adhere to the journalistic standards of the best of the mainstream media. But, because it is run autonomously as a small online startup, we aim to exhibit the fresh thinking and nimbleness of the best of the new media. We want to be first, and sassy, but also well sourced and accurate. We will offer lots of opinion and analysis, but plenty of fact as well.

Read more »


View the original article here

11/12/10

Faster Forward: First whispers of the iPad2

Apple component suppliers gave Reuters a Friday morning scoop on an Apple tablet that could be the next-generation iPad.

Sources from five companies in the Apple supply chain spoke to the news agency's branch in Hong Kong. Three companies -- chip designer Wintek, battery maker Simplo and cover manufacturer AVY Precision -- confirmed they were preparing for the next round of iPads. Two camera companies, Genius Electronic Optical Co Ltd and Largan Precision, confirmed they had started a new supply deal with the Cupertino, Calif.-based, company.

Two of the companies said they were making new parts for the next round of iPad production. The main upgrades? Front and rear-facing cameras and an overall improved device: slimmer, lighter and with better resolution.

Further fanning the iPad2 rumors, Apple Insider reported Thursday that leaked images from two case manufacturers, Shenzhen MacTop Electronics and Kodowarisan, also suggest a rear-facing camera and a spot for an SD card slot.


View the original article here